Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine George
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 23:09, 5 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:07, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Catherine George[edit]
- Catherine George (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
- Grace Green (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Rosemary Hammond (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Jackie Merritt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Stephanie Howard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
These articles are all about novelists who specialize in category romances. A category romance, by definition, is available for sale for only one month and then goes out of print. I have found no reviews of their books and have found no significant coverage in independent sources of the authors themselves. The best "sources" available are the publisher's website, or sites listing the author name and hte names of the books. BLPs deserve better. I think these authors don't meet WP:AUTHOR or the GNG and as such the articles should be deleted. Karanacs (talk) 21:35, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nominator. Karanacs (talk) 21:35, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:AUTHOR. Peteinterpol (talk) 15:54, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Dana boomer (talk) 19:44, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. --Sulmues Let's talk 15:41, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per WP:AUTHOR and lack of significant coverage. Hekerui (talk) 11:57, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nominator did their research well. I concur. --MelanieN (talk) 03:44, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.