Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Whitehead
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:48, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Danny Whitehead[edit]
- Danny Whitehead (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD contested by Wna247 (talk · contribs) with the explanation (posted at my TP) of "I believe that this article can be kept as the player was named in a football league side (stockport county) that was in a fully professional league (n-power league 2) in the 2010-11 season. I also believe that it passes most criteria to be an article". However, the subject did not make any appearances in a fully pro league and so fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Also fails WP:GNG. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 22:20, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 22:20, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 22:20, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league, failing WP:NSPORT, and there is insufficient coverage to merit keeping this articl under WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:22, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Fails both specific & general guidelines. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 22:26, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom – "I also believe that it passes most criteria to be an article"; well, there is only two criteria applicable and fails both. The player hasn't played in a fully professional league and has received nothing but routine coverage. – Kosm1fent 06:21, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. --sparkl!sm hey! 10:19, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 01:37, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:42, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.