Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Crown

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 17:47, 6 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Crown[edit]

Eric Crown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lots of namedropping, inhouse publishing and vagueness, but the years-old tags at the top suggest nn. Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert D. Parker, as Alansohn says "The article has a lot of stuff, much of which comes across as a very thorough search of media mentions, almost all trivial. There's nothing here to support a claim of notability and nothing further found in a Google search." Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:12, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:32, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:32, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.