Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jam 9
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:02, 7 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 05:02, 7 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn. SL93 (talk) 02:12, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Jam 9 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found zero sources. The band won a rookie award and only released one song according to the article. That was back in 2003. The official website is a dead link. Fails WP:MUSIC. SL93 (talk) 03:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - A basic Google returned the correct URL for the site, which I have now fixed on the page, so the "dead link" comment should no longer be valid. Still, I couldn't find any reliable sources either, but that might just be because I'm not hitting the right terms. Really could do with somebody from Japan having a look and lending local expertise. --Ritchie333 (talk) 12:31, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:48, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Response - I checked the Oricon website in Japan (Oricon produces the primary music chart used in Japan) and found that Jam-9 has produced four singles that have charted, the highest reaching no. 122 (see here). The Oricon chart expanded to 200 in 2002. They've only produced one album with a major label, and that reached no. 77 on the album chart (see here). If we follow WP:BAND, this would seem to satisfy criteria 2: "Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart"--even though the charting was not that high. I looked for something on their rookie award, but that seems to be a mistake. Their own official site profile states that a song from their indie album "Rookie Players" was selected as the support song for the Shimizu S-Pulse football team (Jam-9 comes from that area of Japan). That doesn't appear to be exactly right. The S-Pulse website does not list it as the official support song, but mentions that it was a tie-up song for one of their official events (see here). Michitaro (talk) 01:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It looks like it might pass WP:BAND because of the music chart. If that is found to be the case, I will withdraw this. SL93 (talk) 01:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you need another source to confirm the charts? I provided links to Oricon's own database. Being new to band-related AfDs, I just want to make sure. Since they charted pretty low, it might be hard to find other sources. Michitaro (talk) 02:02, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think so. I've seen AfDs just pass because of a verified chart rating. SL93 (talk) 02:11, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Because it appears to pass WP:BAND, I will withdraw. SL93 (talk) 02:12, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you need another source to confirm the charts? I provided links to Oricon's own database. Being new to band-related AfDs, I just want to make sure. Since they charted pretty low, it might be hard to find other sources. Michitaro (talk) 02:02, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It looks like it might pass WP:BAND because of the music chart. If that is found to be the case, I will withdraw this. SL93 (talk) 01:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Michitaro (talk) 01:22, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.