Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Baldock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:43, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Baldock[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence for meeting NARTIST - and apparently a paid article in violation of the terms of use. DGG ( talk ) 05:46, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:18, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:18, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete - nom nailed it. Jytdog (talk) 00:33, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per DGG. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:02, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per nom. Searches did not turn up enough to pass WP:GNG, and definitely doesn't pass WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:34, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.