Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Harycki
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:19, 7 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 09:19, 7 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ken Harycki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable politician, mayor of small town WuhWuzDat 19:03, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - After cleaning up the POV on the article and looking for sources, I don't think this person meets WP:POLITICIAN or WP:BIO. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 19:05, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to Stillwater, Minnesota as article fails notability criteria for politicians, but is a valid search term. Armbrust Talk Contribs 19:27, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Why do you censor comments about a mayor who is using your media as a free ad instead of simply deleting it as suggested? Elections have finite time frames and every day he gets your unabashed support is un-American! Either allow comments about his failed mayorship, or take the topic totally down. If you do not, I will file a complaint with the election board regarding your campaign ad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.196.123.181 (talk) 00:39, 23 August 2010 (UTC) — 184.196.123.181 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:BIO. Jmlk17 02:09, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This article is a blatant attempt to get free campaign advertising. The links all point to the current re-election campaign.173.141.47.243 (talk) 15:59, 27 August 2010 (UTC) — 173.141.47.243 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- I disagree with your analysis that the article is blatant advertising. It's pretty simple with minimal content. It doesn't even mention that he's running for re-election. It certainly is not true that all the links point to his campaign. One of the sources is a local news article about all the candidates. The other one uses his campaign website to verify biographical information. In addition, I don't believe the sourcing violates WP:RS. The issue here is that subject fails to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and most likely the article will be deleted in a couple of days. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 16:13, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to Stillwater, Minnesota - per nom, is a non-notable politician whose article fails both WP:POLITICIAN or WP:BIO; however, it is a viable search term, and should redirect to the article about the town/city. --- Barek (talk) - 17:06, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Non-notable local politician. Uncle Dick (talk) 19:14, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.