Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Arthur Stroud
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:22, 7 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 09:22, 7 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep per WP:SK, clear consensus and nominator withdrew as article has been greatly improved (NAC). American Eagle (talk) 00:13, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Kenneth Arthur Stroud (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable author. Google searches return no reliable sources. Neither do Google News Archive searches. Cunard (talk) 21:35, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I can't find any evidence that he did anything as a research mathematician (MathSciNet lists only one of his textbooks) but the textbook authorship may be enough for WP:PROF #4. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:34, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Keep per this reference from Times Higher Education which credits him as an innovator in "programmed learning" and calls his textbook "one of the most successful mathematics textbooks ever published." He also seems to be a pioneer in using learning outcomes, now ubiquitous in engineering education and spreading to other areas as well. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:56, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:34, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The source linked by David Eppstein above puts notability beyond doubt. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:07, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn/Keep David Eppstein's expansion of the article proves that Stroud is notable. Nice save! Cunard (talk) 06:02, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.