Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonid Kanter
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 03:35, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Leonid Kanter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject doesn't appear to meet our notability guidelines, as demonstrated by a Google search in English and Ukrainian. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:07, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 12:33, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 12:33, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete No sources available to pass WP:GNG, WP:DIRECTOR... Could have been soft deleted. Lourdes 14:04, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- I did consider soft deleting, but noticed the article had been de-prodded already. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 14:33, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- filelakeshoe, you're right. Missed that. Thanks, Lourdes 01:43, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- I did consider soft deleting, but noticed the article had been de-prodded already. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 14:33, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not Linkedin ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 14:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, no prejudice against a redirect per WP:ATD, but I don't see a viable target at the moment. Maybe TOOSOON as well. L3X1 (distænt write) 17:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.