Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LimitPblank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:18, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LimitPblank

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable product: doesn't seem to exist anywhere except WP. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 12:02, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I PRODed this but the creator removed it. There's no indication of notability at all, and no Google hits other than the WP article itself and a mirror of the creator's user talk page. Neatsfoot (talk) 12:21, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 12:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. Could probably be done under A7 or A11. No secondary sources anywhere to even confirm that this game exists or will exist. Cannolis (talk) 13:41, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: A7 doesn't apply to products, unfortunately. Kolbasz (talk) 14:06, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Zero notability and credibility. WP:GNG, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:MADEUP, take your pick. Kolbasz (talk) 14:11, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The above comments state the reason quite well. --Clean-up-wiki-guy (talk) 16:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable and lacks sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:14, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.