Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margo (soap) (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 19:56, 7 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 19:56, 7 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:01, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Margo (soap) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable commercial product Orange Mike | Talk 01:44, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:N. It seems to be advertising too. Endofskull (talk) 02:18, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable product. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:18, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The few refs I've added are sufficient to show significant coverage, if more are needed they can be picked out from gbooks or gnews archives. —SpacemanSpiff 16:19, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This is one of the oldest brands in India and has been the subject of several academic studies and has received continuous coverage to differentiate it from run of the mill brands--Sodabottle (talk) 04:56, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A well-known soap brand. [1][2][3][4] --Redtigerxyz Talk 16:04, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The added references show sufficient notability. --bonadea contributions talk 19:32, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sufficient reference to establish notablitity. KuwarOnline Talk 05:15, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:N and WP:NOTADVERTISING. Rabbabodrool (talk) 20:11, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.