Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Sue From Alabama
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 23:57, 7 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 23:57, 7 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Miss Sue From Alabama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No sources found in Books or Scholar that discuss this song in depth. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:57, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The song appears to be a historic song sung and brought by Afro-American slaves (as one source I found states) upon coming to America. This is one of those times where its borderline for me since it was also on a music CD and I'm sure there is a history here that might only be in dead trees. Syn 22:21, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable song. Niteshift36 (talk) 07:31, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This book shows that this song was notable enough to have been recorded by at least three different groups before 1940, a time when making any recording was a big deal, and, according to this book, it was a well-known playsong. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:57, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:08, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep based on the sources found by Phil Bridger. Edward321 (talk) 04:22, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per Mr. Bridger's discoveries. The article needs better referencing, but it doesn't deserve to be deleted. Pastor Theo (talk) 12:55, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.