Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo Universe (EXEcutional)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clear consensus DGG ( talk ) 04:23, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neo Universe (EXEcutional)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Topic is about a fictional game within a comic/manga series. Topic has no coverage from reliable secondary sources. Article is composed of trivia and original research. The1337gamer (talk) 11:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 11:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Completely trivial. TheMagikCow (talk) 12:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't see any notability for this subject, and it doesn't help that the article is written almost completely from an in-universe perspective.--Martin IIIa (talk) 13:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:FANCRUFT and WP:LISTCRUFT. No independent notability or coverage in reliable sources. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:13, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above comments. Aoba47 (talk) 17:38, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:38, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.