Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noel Gillespie
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 11:04, 8 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 11:04, 8 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 18:23, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Noel Gillespie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable assistant coach (hate to do this to a fellow Milwaukeean, but fair is fair). Orange Mike | Talk 20:22, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:33, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:34, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep, based solely on the fact that he's an NBA assistant coach, not just any assistant coach. I'm not finding a whole lot of coverage from outside NBA.com, but he's discussed a little bit in the book 07 Seconds or Less, and I see at least a few newspaper mentions. Zagalejo^^^ 02:21, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- reply "a few newspaper mentions" does not constitute the requisite substantial coverage! --Orange Mike | Talk 21:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Meh. I said weak keep. Come what may. Zagalejo^^^ 22:50, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- reply "a few newspaper mentions" does not constitute the requisite substantial coverage! --Orange Mike | Talk 21:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:GNG with only trivial coverage from independent sources. Not much to objectively write about without sources existing. —Bagumba (talk) 08:08, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Bagumba Darkness Shines (talk) 18:18, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.