Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peach blossom debt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:31, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peach blossom debt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable, cannot find reliable sources. Vozhuo (talk) 05:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

meets GNG (see http://www.huaxia.com/zhwh/yd/2016/06/4882484.html and http://news.xinhuanet.com/book/2016-07/08/c_129128885.htm. And recently became the subject of a copyright dispute with another author, news coverage growing fast.--Skyfiler (talk) 18:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:06, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It has a real ISBN and exists, if that's what the nominator means by sourcing. That should be added to the article. 158.59.127.132 (talk) 15:52, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:06, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:57, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.