Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remotely Funny

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 22:55, 8 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:30, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Remotely Funny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:GNG and WP:PROMO. Non-noteable unreleased television show. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 21:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but it comes out on February 13, so more info will be added then. BeanoMaster (talk) 09:35, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I feel there is now enough info, with more in the coming days, for it to not be considered for deletion. BeanoMaster (talk) 21:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:48, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:08, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 📞 What I've done 20:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So that's decided then. BeanoMaster (talk) 17:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.