User talk:AlessandroTiandelli333

Hello.

AlessandroTiandelli333, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi AlessandroTiandelli333! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Craig_Dillon

Hi AlessandroTiandelli333, I wanted to make you aware of the deletion of a page.

Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2021_June_17

— Preceding unsigned comment added by T.corbett (talk • contribs) 18:06, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ken Bone (Political Activist)

Hello AlessandroTiandelli333,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ken Bone (Political Activist) for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TimothyJosephWood 17:23, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi AlessandroTiandelli333! I've just deleted Ken Bone (Political Activist). While I deleted Talk:Ken Bone (Political Activist) as well (it's standard to delete orphaned talk pages), I wanted to address the rationale for keeping that you presented. While there's a good argument that Ken Bone meets the general notability guideline, he definitely also meets the one-event rule from the biographies of living persons policy, and the existing deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Bone echoed that in concluding that Mr. Bone doesn't (currently) meet the inclusion criteria on his own. If something new came up, then there'd be a good case to be made for recreating the article, but that hasn't happened yet, and chances are it won't. {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}} 21:04, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tyrone Magnus

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tyrone Magnus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:25, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Ike Densmore

Hi. I see you created Ike Densmore whom I don't think is notable. Adding fictional categories makes no sense unless you just want to be blocked. Please slow down and learn how to edit Wikipedia before attempting stuff like this. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:34, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

I think the changes you made are fair and justified. However, I would argue that he is notable because he has received coverage in both local and national sources in multiple countries for multiple events over a sustained period of time. I would also argue that the YouTube links you removed are not illegal because they are to the official channel of Don Shipley (Navy SEAL) who is mentioned constantly in the article, I would guess he probably gained the rights for it. Thanks, AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 21:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

I think it's more reasonable to believe that Shipley stole that content from ABC7 because he figured it would be considered fair use. Regardless, we'd have to have proof and we generally don't allow YouTube as a source although you'll see it now and then. Citing ABC7 directly would be fine. I'm not so sure about the notability because there are better sources out there and you ought to improve the article to make a case for general notability. Please also read WP:CRIMINAL. Wikipedia is very hesitant to call people criminals without real evidence of a conviction. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Abalin Roman Valerevich

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abalin Roman Valerevich requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Exemplo347 (talk) 21:11, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hello, I'm RSTech1. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Stonewall (charity)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RSTech1 (talk) 17:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Bill Young (soccer)

Your page move (and associated edit) was wrong for a variety of reasons, and I have reverted. The sport is 'soccer' in Canada, and you mis-used capitals. Please do not move again; instead try WP:RM. GiantSnowman 18:01, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Big Rigs

you cant really do that without a discussion, since the game is obviously notable

Redirecting an article is fine without a discussion, but it's subject to the Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle as is any edit. As for obviously notable, I think other editors will disagree with you. With only two reviews and some spotted coverage that repeats the same points ("it's bad"), Big Rigs is already adequately covered in its parent section (in List of video games notable for negative reception). czar 17:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hello, I'm Boing! said Zebedee. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive938 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You appear to have added your message to an archive page, which is a preserved record which should not be changed (and where nobody will respond) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:36, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of The Great Meme War for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Great Meme War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great Meme War until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JudgeRM (talk to me) 02:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tyrone Magnus (Attempt 2)

I saw that you have self-reverted the Speedy deletion. It says that you cannot "remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself." Although Tyrone had appeared on the NBC article, he is not notable per WP:ONEEVENT. It is like me creating a Wikipedia page for myself because I have appeared in this CNN article as "Yoshiman646".Yoshiman6464 (talk) 05:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

I have added alot more sources, especially ones to do with his acting so it passes WP:ONEEVENT. Shouldn't really remove the tag but admins don't really look at these things and I don't really want to rewrite. If you still have concerns despite the new sources you can afd, it doesn't meet guidelines for speedy. Thanks, AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 09:59, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

You are not allowed to remove speedy deletion tags from article you have created yourself, no exceptions. If you want to contest it, do so on the talk page without removing the tag. Thank you. JudgeRM (talk to me) 17:55, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Look at the article now though, there are 8 reliable sources linked, does not meet criteria at all but I wont remove and watch as it gets falsely deleted. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 18:04, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great Meme War

Your latest edit summary at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great Meme War is wrong. Those kinds of comments should be signed. the first very obvious reason is that it is a discussion page and all comments on the discussion page should be signed. Another reason is that without a signature someone could mistakenly attribute the comment to the person whose post is directly below the comment. Please do not remove the signatures again and if you add any more comments, please sign them - GB fan 19:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great Meme War

Please stop adding tags to votes you believe should be discounted. Admins know the policies and guidelines and do not need your help to determine how to weigh the comments that editors have left. - GB fan 12:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 02:41, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

famousbirthdays.com is not a reliable source

Hi AlessandroTiandelli333 . I'm in the process of removing famousbirthdays.com as a source from Wikipedia, because it's not reliable (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). I noticed that you've added it, and wanted to make sure you understood why it's being removed. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 19:50, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, you may be blocked from editing. ^{(talk page stalker)} CrashUnderride 08:06, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Note

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ken Bone (disambiguation)

The article Ken Bone (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:3DABS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Nevé–selbert 06:36, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Ken Bone (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ken Bone (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Bone (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Nevé–selbert 13:30, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Doctor Benjy

Hello, AlessandroTiandelli333. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Doctor Benjy, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Rentier (talk) 08:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of 3kliksphilip for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 3kliksphilip is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3kliksphilip until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rentier (talk) 09:04, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Diego Garcia into Terrorism in the British Indian Ocean Territory. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, AlessandroTiandelli333. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of David Vance (British politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Vance (British politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Vance (British politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 23:49, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of shortest-lived sovereign states

A tag has been placed on List of shortest-lived sovereign states requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TDL (talk) 12:57, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AlessandroTiandelli333. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AlessandroTiandelli333. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Short livers

Irregularities. When I looked today user:AlessandroTiandelli333 and user:AlessandroTiandelli333/short livers were both an unfortunate mix of user page material and draft article. I have tried to resolve that but I see that I have left one state of the short livers draft in User:AlessandroTiandelli333. It was not the latest edit so it can stay there!

Worse, the short livers draft had been created by a copy&paste and so it concealed the ~700 edits done by others. I have fixed that fault.

What to do now? I think the page is worth preserving. But since the AfD discussion is relatively recent, I suggest that no attempt to make it live be made before 2020. But in the mean time there is lots that could be done providing reliable references.

But please, please: keep User:AlessandroTiandelli333 as your user page and do all edits to the draft in User:AlessandroTiandelli333/short livers. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:34, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 20:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Honicknowle Defence Regiment

If you are going to create articles like this, then please monitor them yourself (put them on your watchlist and check it) as they as magnets for vandalism. Shenme (talk) 04:16, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Gangs in Plymouth

A tag has been placed on Category:Gangs in Plymouth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:26, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

• removed speedy deletion as category is no longer empty. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 12:49, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Talk

You should not alter posts after they have been replied to.Slatersteven (talk) 17:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Slatersteven, I was correcting myself, apologies. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 17:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

AlessandroTiandelli333, if you want to remove something you wrote without altering the context of a reply, you can strike the text. Instructions are at WP:TALK#REPLIED. Vexations (talk) 19:05, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Helpful alerts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Patriotic Alternative for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patriotic Alternative is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patriotic Alternative until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

doktorb _words^deeds 07:35, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Tyrone Magnus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tyrone Magnus, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyrone Magnus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)