Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shukla Beharilal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 13:10, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shukla Beharilal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPERSON. DrStrauss talk 11:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:56, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No sources outside of incidental mentions; therefore does not meet notability guidelines. --Hazarasp (talk) 14:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:BASIC. Andrew D. (talk) 18:20, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Also fails WP:BLP1E - GretLomborg (talk) 17:11, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 23:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 11:09, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We can't add the first girl of every region in the world, or even of India to get in Oxford. First girl to get there, ok, first Indian girl, okay, but let's not get too far.-- Socerb102 (talk) 20:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.