Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tally Weijl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. In the absence of further discussion, I am going to close this as keep and will implement DGG's suggestion to revdel the versions after 2010. Randykitty (talk) 14:55, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tally Weijl

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is very promotional in tone, and at least one user representing the subject has edited it. Searched for good sources that can be used to improve the article, but none was found. Alexius08 (talk) 14:11, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 14:30, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 14:37, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:46, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 18:13, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete current versions, Restore earlier version The current article is so promotional as to be a G11. But I see there's a nonpromotional version from 2010 by a reliable editor. The company is large enough to justify some coverage. I suggest rev-deleting all versions later than that. DGG ( talk ) 18:18, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:42, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.