Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tandelsham
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 20:21, 11 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedily deleted. (Non-admin closure) GorillaWarfare talk 13:49, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Tandelsham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I originally speedied this as a hoax, as there are no Google hits on it other than the article itself, and map sites haven't heard of it. The speedy was removed (it's a coincidence that two people who know it would turn up together, when the rest of the world apparently hasn't heard of it), but with no evidence that it exists. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:04, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawing nomination, as the article has been speedy-deleted as a blatant hoax. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:41, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently the pub has now closed, meaning that Tendelsham only consists of two houses. It is a place in Devon. The fact that online maps have not heard of it is not surprising. Anyone who knows these rural parts can understand that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.36.42.130 (talk) 12:22, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.