Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarana-e-Pakistan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 20:29, 11 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Michig (talk) 07:07, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tarana-e-Pakistan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bogus article. There are sources pointing that such a thing never existed. The controversy is a very minor thing and this article gives undue weight to it. —ШαмıQ @ 04:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It is a historical article about Pakistan's first National Anthem. This article must not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiBulova (talkcontribs) 12:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is no historical evidence that this Anthem ever existed or was approved by Jinnah. It does not need an article here on Wikipedia. —ШαмıQ @ 18:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 00:46, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:27, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.