Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tessa Ogden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:41, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tessa Ogden[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost-unsourced BLP. Has been PRODded before, and dePRODded in March 2017 with "Needs expansion but enough to work on". The only source is one which verifies that she is CEO of CEPR but adds no other info. The rest of the content was added, unsourced, when the article was created by an editor who has made 5 edits, 3 of them about this person. No indication of notability, no sources to support most of the article. No useful ghits found. If we remove the unsourced BLP content we are left with "is the CEO of CERP". A redirect to Centre for Economic Policy Research would be appropriate, as she is mentioned there in infobox. PamD 21:08, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Inclined to agree with nom on this one; there is absolutely zero sourcing in the article to establish even a glimmer of a chance of passing WP:GNG, or even verifying the minimalist claims of fact made about this individual. My own searches turned up nothing more than the usual personal social media, and the occasional listing of a past or present staff position, but nothing that looks like a reliable, secondary source, and certainly nothing which established notability. Snow ^{let's rap} 23:29, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 02:30, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 02:31, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 02:31, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 02:31, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No RS, SPA-created, all OR, and on down the line. Agricola44 (talk) 17:20, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.