Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Farkel Family
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 22:54, 11 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 22:54, 11 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Rowan & Martin's Laugh-In#Recurring sketches and characters. (non-admin closure) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:54, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The Farkel Family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
unref article, tagged for notability for 5 years Boleyn (talk) 19:35, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect I couldn't find reliable secondary references for notability, but YouTube videos and entries at tv.com show the topic as verifiable. There is already a paragraph on the skit at Rowan & Martin's Laugh-In; a redirect there is probably best. Mark viking (talk) 20:39, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect I grew up watching "Laugh-In" reruns; these characters are really not anywhere near the level of notability that would justify a dedicated page (quite frankly, I can't really think of any characters from the show that would meet notability). Redirect should work just fine. Benscripps (talk) 22:12, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:01, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:01, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.