User talk:Knowitall659

Hello this is my talk page. Please make a new section for all messages.

Zeburaika

The third entry in Template:Nihongo is for the literal transliteration of Japanese into the English alphabet. It is not for the "Japanese name". That is why the entry on Zebstrika should have {{nihongo|'''Zebstrika'''|ゼブライカ|Zeburaika}} and not {{nihongo|'''Zebstrika'''|ゼブライカ|Zebraika}}. If you have official proof that the name is "Zebraika" in Japan, you can change that to {{nihongo|'''Zebstrika'''|ゼブライカ|Zeburaika|Zebraika}}.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:47, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well I got the name from Bulbapedia. --Knowitall659 (talk) 18:58, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bulbapedia is not a reliable source.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:02, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

In a recent edit to the page Loser (novel), you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Chzz ► 00:54, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, got it. There's still a spelling error. --Tepigisthe498th (talk to me!) 12:12, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Connor Newspaper back.pdf

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Connor Newspaper back.pdf. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. mechamind 9 0 18:33, 29 March 2011 (UTC) delete it.--Tepigisthe498th (talk to me!) 17:13, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nintendo task force membership update

Hello,

It's that time again to update membership status with the Nintendo task force, which we try to do periodically to keep our membership up-to-date.

All participants have been placed on an "Inactive participants" list. To confirm that you're still a member of the Nintendo task force, simply go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Nintendo#Members and move your name from the "Inactive participants" list to the bottom of the "Active participants" list. If you are no longer an active member in the task force, you may simply remove your name altogether. After 1 month, on 1 August 2011, all entries under the "Inactive participants" list will be removed. Hopefully you can stay with us and continue to work on Nintendo-related articles. Regards, MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pixels (2014 film)

The article Pixels (2014 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Future film failing WP:NFF.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 11:38, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]