User talk:Piotr Blass

A tag has been placed on Piotr blass, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Piotr blass is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Piotr blass. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. Also, please use regualar capitalization instead of all caps to improve readability. Thank you. --Transfinite 03:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --Wildnox 03:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and please do not type in all caps. --Wildnox 03:57, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:VAIN

Please read WP:VAIN. Thanks. --Woohookitty^(meow) 05:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Caps

Per the above it would definitely help your cause if you didnt type in caps all the time. a) it's almost unreadable, b) it does not become a man of your intellect. Thank you Sir. - Glen 05:35, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reply

(Reply to "thanks could you send me the cleaned up article i cannot find it i tried resubmitting and was deleted within 5 minutes zariski lives! piotrek")

Sorry, I dont have a copy of the old article. If you want to say something about yourself you can do so on your user page (click the tab saying "Piotr Blass" near the top of the page, or go to User:Piotr Blass). It is not a good idea to put personal information (such as your email address or details of your family) on wikipedia, as there are quite a few rather strange editors.

If you click the help link on the left, it gives a lot of information about editing wikipedia. If you need more help or advice you can leave a question on my talk page. There is some useful information about editing math articles at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Mathematics Wikipedia:Manual of Style Wikipedia:Manual of Style (mathematics) Wikipedia:Requested articles/mathematics. And if you are looking for something to do, the Enriques surface article could do with more on the characteristic 2 case.

When you put a comment on a talk page, you can sign it with 4 twiddles ~~~~; this will add your name and date, like this: R.e.b. 16:10, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

another reply

(reply to "could you help me construct my piotr blass page so that it will not be rejected")

See Wikipedia:User page for more information about exactly what is allowed on user pages (such as User:Piotr Blass). In practice, user pages of people who have made useful contributions to wikipedia are usually allowed to have almost anything reasonable on them. If you want to get a copy of a deleted article, you could try sending a note to whichever admin deleted it, asking if it could be moved to your user page, as I think admins have access to old deleted pages. R.e.b. 17:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(reply to "Could you help me locate the admin who deleted my article so i can e mail him to put it back on my user page?")

If you go to an AfD page (such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piotr Blass) it lists the admin who closed the discussion near the top. But my guess is that you could ask any admin to recover the old article. Some of the admins who work on math articles are user:Charles Matthews, user:Michael Hardy, user:Oleg Alexandrov, user:Lethe user:Jitse Niesen. I suggest asking Jitse Niesen (he voted to keep the article, so he certainly wont mind it as a user page). R.e.b. 17:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The text is now on your user page, User:Piotr Blass. Enjoy. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Enough vanity articles already

This is your final warning. If you continue to vandalize pages on Wikipedia, make inappropriate edits or personal attacks, including inappropriate or offensive edit summaries, or continue to cause problems in other ways, you will be blocked from editing indefinitely. Ryūlóng 06:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The issue lies in your disruptive edits to the article on the Zariski surface, as well as your constant postings of your personal biography. You can keep your biography on your user page (where it is now). Perhaps if you tried to conform to the formatting and mark-up of Wikipedia articles, did not utilize Wikipedia to publish your own personal research, and let other editors write about it or you. And I would rather not meet up with you, nothing personal, I just have issues meeting up with people who I am in minor conflicts with online due to recent emails from an unrelated user. Ryūlóng 07:13, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again, it is nothing against you, it is just that Wikipedia should not be used to publish your mathematic research or your autobiography. I can tell from your fervor that you are well knowledged on these subjects, it is just that it is one of the precepts of what wikipedia is not. And even if I did use my real name, it would be way too common for any value of being unique. I prefer this username. And, maybe, I will go to your lecture, if my current schedule permits. I am afraid, though, that my current level of mathematics may not allow me to comprehend such a concept. Ryūlóng 07:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I realize that you wish to have this information in its fullest state on Wikipedia, but Wikipedia is not a text book (that's what Wikiversity and Wikibooks are for) and again, Wikipedia is not the place to publish your personal research, even if it is something that you yourself have created and are an expert in. Mathematics may not be my field of expertise, and it is your own, but I still think that it is a little wrong that you are publishing your research on Wikipedia, where it can be editted by anyone. There are surely many mathematics journals that will benefit from your research on Zariski surfaces, whereas Wikipedia is not the best place for such discourse. Ryūlóng 08:14, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Minor footnote to all of this: As a courtesy for other editors, kindly observe Wikipedia guidelines and sign your talk page and user talk page posts. To do so simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added. For further info see: Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thanks. Ryūlóng 08:14, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I remember my Greek mythology correctly, then I understand your connection to your creations. It's just that it's frowned upon in the Wikipedia community to write about yourself in such ways. Ryūlóng 08:48, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another minor footnote, don't put brackets around your signature, it screws it up, a bit. Ryūlóng 08:48, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zariski surfaces

(reply to "COULD YOU HELP ME RESTORE MY WRITINGS ON ZARISKI SURFACES")

I've restored your last edit to Zariski surfaces (you can also do this yourself by clicking on the "history" button and editing one of the old versions). I also did some copy editing on your work, and in particular broke it up into smaller sections. You can edit the individual sections by clicking the "edit" tab at the top of each section: this is easier than editing the whole article at once. You can make new sections by typing a new section heading enclosed in pairs of = signs (look at the source for some articles to see what I mean). R.e.b. 04:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability per WP:BIO

The article BLASS FAMILY has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a person or group of persons but it does not indicate how or why that person or group is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. --Konstable 01:13, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and please stop using caps, it makes it seem like you're yelling.--Konstable 01:13, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel that the criteria are satisfied, please let me know. But there is also something very important which probably means you could never create that page your self, have a read of Wikipedia:Vanity guidelines. It is strongly discouraged that subjects of the articles do not create the articles themselves. If you satisfy the notability criteria you should generally wait for someone to write the article for you. This is really an encyclopedia a host of personal descriptions.--Konst.able 12:12, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability and sourcing

Over the last few days you have added information to the Jim Davis, Charlie Crist, and Mark Foley pages that is not properly sourced. I have removed/am in the process of removing it. You must properly cite your sources, and you should not add any information that is not verified. This is especially important for living people. Captainktainer * Talk 04:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Piotr Blass (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17411 was submitted on Jan 27, 2017 04:14:32. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:14, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]