User talk:Bradross63

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Bradross63! Thank you for your contributions. I am Gobonobo and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! gobonobo ⁺ ^c 03:34, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Model 90 before-after.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Model 90 before-after.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:SH-collection BradRoss.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SH-collection BradRoss.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:SH-collection BradRoss.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SH-collection BradRoss.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:SH-collection BradRoss.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SH-collection BradRoss.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 10:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can add it by following the instructions here. Feel free to ping me if you need assistance. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 09:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry DQ, I can't figure out how to do this and honestly, don't have the time to fiddle around with it. This photo is mine, but should have no restrictions for use. Not sure how the "no fair use" tag got added, but in any event, it should be removed. Do with it what must be done. If the photo needs to be deleted, so be it. The edit process here is WAY too complicated for me. Bradross63 (talk) 01:16, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Vancouver. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. freshacconci (✉) 20:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]