User talk:D64

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello D64, and welcome to Wikipedia! You may want to take a look at the welcome page, tutorial, stylebook, avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers such as yourself:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --M @th wiz 2020 20:48, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SEUCK.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:SEUCK.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:07, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks, D64, for (Ice House Dam) pointing out that 90,000 MW is absurdly large ... yeah, that's probably more than all the nukes in the US! Somehow forgot to take the 000's out, thanks for the catch. I did that on another Dam edit that day ... must have been an off day. Twang (talk) 00:38, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correction

Thank you for adding the comma to Duke of Marmalade. It's the kind of thing that doesn't show up very well when editing, so I'm glad you spotted it- especially as article is GA candidate.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 13:46, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Isle of Man TT Mountain Course‎, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 12:45, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]