User talk:Vif12vf

Enjoy the Thandai

		A glass of Thandai for you
		Here is a glass of Thandai for you. Thandai is a traditional Indian cold drink prepared with a mixture of almonds, fennel seeds, watermelon kernels, rose petals, pepper, vetiver seeds, cardamom, saffron, milk and sugar. Thanks a lot for your efforts in fighting vandals. It will be helpful to you if you use WP:Twinkle. Because it provides several options that come handy and make it faster to revert vandalism. Try it, I hope you will like it. If you have any questions feel free to ping me. cheers and regards. Thank you. DBig Xrayᗙ 17:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply] For more Indian dishes, visit the Kitchen of WikiProject India.

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Good work with Twinkle, keeping Wikipedia free from Vandalism. Keep it up. Try WP:Stiki as well. cheers. DBig Xrayᗙ 21:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Vif12vf, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,
Meatsgains^(talk) 01:51, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Greetings.

Hello Vif12vf: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, DBig Xrayᗙ 15:53, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Hope the new year will bring more friendly debates and collaboration between us.

--DBig Xrayᗙ 15:53, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Nice work, comrade. puggo 00:45, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. puggo (talk) 23:07, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Socialism

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's socialism articles. Did you know there's a WikiProject for editors interested in writing about socialism? If you would like to join, simply click the Join WikiProject button on the WikiProject Socialism page. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the WikiProject Socialism talk page.

We look forward to working with you in the future! MarioGom (talk) 20:09, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello Vif12vf, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020.
Happy editing,
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:57, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Happy holidays!

Hello Vif12vf: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, DBig Xrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 14:48, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Happy New Year, Vif12vf!

Happy New Year!

Vif12vf,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:18, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Page related issue

	Page related issue
	Did you edit JanaSena page? Vikas4554 (talk) 16:10, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like this is a bit of a weird way to start a thread, but yes i did. I removed some recent unsourced additions implying a party merger! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:12, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Diwali!

Happy Diwali!!!

Sky full of fireworks,
Mouth full of sweets,
Home full of lamps,
And festival full of sweet memories...

Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:46, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Send Diwali wishings by adding {{subst:Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Thank you, and may you have a happy Diwali as well :D Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 11:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Autie Pact

Hi Vif12vf. I saw on your page you have the userbox for "This user supports Autism and Asperger's awareness" and thought you might like to sign this - User:ThatPeskyCommoner/The Autie Pact. All the best. Helper201 (talk) 15:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Ho Ho

M.Bitton (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20}} to your friends' talk pages.

Thank you, all the best to you and your family as well :D Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 22:48, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Organized labour project

Thank you for joining the Organized Labour project. I've been a participant in the project since 2006 and am helping with a revival of it. As part this we are introducing a new membership system, which will help with communications among participants. This involves creating a membership file for each participant within your user space (you can see an example of my membership card here: User:Goldsztajn/WikiProjectCards/WikiProject Organized Labour). This system is already in operation within a number of wikiprojects (such as Women in Red and Medicine). You will not have to do anything, myself or someone else from the project will create the relevant file within your userspace. However, I am conscious that it is not polite to change an editor's user space without notice. If I don't hear from you in the negative, I will go ahead with making the change after the 18th of January. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Many thanks for supporting the project, in solidarity, --Goldsztajn (talk) 10:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This sounds good to me :) Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 12:32, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hello, comrade. I appreciate your tenacity trying to change the absurd description of DPRK's regime. It's sort of ludicrous that people hide behind "consensus" on de jure definitions which would be easily accepted had the country been inside the USA's sphere of influence. Keds (talk) 19:21, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

Cheers! CentreLeftRight ✉ 18:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh um, thanks. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 18:58, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for fixing my edit to Alaska Republicans, I accidentally edited an old version. Apologies. ^_^ Mycranthebigman (talk) 17:39, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, things happen :) Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 22:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, dear comrade

		The Workers' Barnstar
		This user has shown great editing skills in improving articles related to Communism or Socialism.
		_{this WikiAward was given to Vif12vf by Yue🌙 on 07:11, 23 October 2022 (UTC)}[reply]

Thank you for your nearly nine years of service improving articles related to communism or socialism on Wikipedia. Here's to another nine, and many more. 🍻 Yue🌙 07:11, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :D Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 13:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding user warnings

Could you please make a commitment to issue more warnings towards edits you have reverted (especially good faith ones) and report them to WP:AIV? This is basic RCP procedure. ~~lol1 VNIO⁠🎌 (I made a mistake? talk to me) 09:32, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to only report users when their problematic edits are repeated or bad enough, even then I have a lot of experience with reports being ignored and eventually automatically deleted, which is why my standards for reporting users are kinda high at this point. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 14:16, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps they get ignored because there weren't any warnings on the user talk pages? ~~lol1 VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 16:43, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I usually never report anyone before they vandalise after a final or only warning! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:50, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's the salient point: you don't warn editors (that much) and therefore can't reach a final warning. ~~lol1 VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 17:13, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Vif12vf,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! Packer&Tracker (remark) 17:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Packer&Tracker (remark) 17:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, happy new year 🥳 Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 18:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox comment

Hello Vif12vf, I hope you're doing well. I just wanted to ask about your recent infobox edit to the page for the Agrarian Party of Kazakhstan. Is it standard to remove useful but unused infobox parameters? Obviously ones with little use like "website" shouldn't remain, but I've seen a majority of pages keep parameters with potential. Especially because you can't see these parameters just by viewing the page, I've at least found them helpful when expanding a page and seeing what information needs to be found. That being said, this is super minor stuff, so I'm not really looking to revert the change, just for some clarification. Thanks 🙂 Johnson524 (Talk!) 16:39, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The digital editor makes it easy to re-add parameters when they are needed, thus they should not be kept in place when unused as they often end up cluttering the source version of the article. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:43, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reply. Johnson524 (Talk!) 17:05, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GPCA page bloated by elections

I was thinking that the page Green Party of California was being bloated by election history, and that possibly a page dedicated to that could be made, and the main page just drew highlights from that, and referred to that. let me know what you think 104.33.102.225 (talk) 02:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unitary Democratic Coalition color change

Hello Vif12vf, thank you for your message regarding the Unitary Democratic Coalition (CDU) changes. The issue is that someone has been changing the color of the coalition without discussion. The CDU coalition is a PCP, Communist Party, broad front that also joins two minor parties/associations, the Green Party (PEV) and Democratic Intervention (ID). The coalition itself doesn't have an official color and the most used color to represent it is red because of the dominance, if not total, of the PCP in the coalition. Others colors like Green and Blue are also used. That said, my view is that the color of CDU should remain red for election tables results and other election pages, while it could remain blue in the coalition's page itself. Any change in the coalition's color will lead to big changes in maps, graphics and other supportive info and, if such changes are needed, they should be extensively discussed. Available for further info if necessary.Tuesp1985 (talk) 16:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Might I add that the coalitions page, in fact, doesn't use red, but dark grey and, as of 2022, pea green. The colour is used when members of the coalition are giving press conferences~~, though they use PCP-PEV as their abbreviations, not CDU~~. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 18:47, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, they do use CDU, it's just in the top-left corner of the screen they use that has the other abbreviation. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 18:49, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ValenciaThunderbolt, nice to talk to you. Indded they use that blue in some press conferences. But, they also use flags in red, green and blue. The point I make is that for election tables and result pages, red is the best color as CDU is automatically associated with PCP, and a more "bluish" color would create confusion as CHEGA, CDS and IL already have similar colors. The color of the page the coalition page could remain pea green, like you said, as the coalition doesn't have an official color.Tuesp1985 (talk) 18:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there :) I've asked the user who created this template, that I've been using of pages, to update it for various parliaments, as it is currently only hemispherical. I use it as it's easier to update than images. The coalition is an odd one, as they use both logos of CDU and PCP-PEV. I go by the colour of the logo and the flag, which is the same colour as the logo. Another thing I find odd is that the CDU logo isn't used, but the combination of vignettes of the two parties logos are, even though the website is called CDU-PEV and it's https is called CDU (very odd). I think a wider discussion is best put on the page's talk page, so as not to clutter Vif's talk page. What do you think? ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 19:10, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just found this page too on the website that uses the blue. Also, some of the bottom of the page uses blue too. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 19:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CDU is the name of the coalition, PCP-PEV is the abbreviation used in ballot papers. The CDU logo is actually mistaken with the German CDU sometimes. But, everybody knows that CDU is basically PCP and the rest are just "satellite parties". One example of multiple colors of CDU, flags in a rally. I will start a discussion in the CDU page.Tuesp1985 (talk) 20:39, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay :) ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 20:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, that page no longer exists. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 20:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I opened a discussion in the CDU page. Really? Anyway, here's another example, CDU rally in Braga, and the example I posted above: CDU flags in rally.Tuesp1985 (talk) 20:50, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many parties use multiple colours (see PPP in South Korea), however, they have one main colour. Some parties have customary and official colours (i.e. CDU in Germany and the Christian Democracy in Italy). ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 21:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023 Labour Edit-a-thon

2023 WikiProject Organized Labour/Online Edit-A-Thon

Hello, Vif12vf!
During the entire month of February there will be an ongoing edit-a-thon on all labour related projects across English Wikipedia and sister projects. Register to track your edits and sign up on the edit-a-thon's project page as a participant. To invite other participants paste {{subst:WPLABOR/2023}} on their talk page! This event is organized by WP:WikiProject Organized Labour

~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 00:07, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ideologies Parametre

They are only for ideologies, not what makes an ideology. For example, "Euroscepticism" isn't an ideology and users remove it for pages. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 23:42, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, generally they don't. Policies of various types have always been welcome in party infoboxes. The exception to this would be if it is already covered by something else in the section! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 23:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've just asked an admin called Number 57 to clarify for me. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 23:51, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging pages for speedy deletion

Hello, Vif12vf,

Please do not tag any more pages for speedy deletion until you have thoroughly reviewed WP:CSD so you better understand the limited criteria for speedy deletion and which namespaces they apply to. You can't just make up your own reasons for why a page should be speedy deleted, you have to utilize the accepted criteria. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Florida Democratic Party

I agree with the last edit you made on the page Florida Democratic Party, position should not be included on the page for that chapter of the Democratic Party in the first place because its not even included on the main article, as well as a lack of sources that can confirm anything about that specific chapter and its ideology. Glad we could come to a compromise. Norge17maii (talk) 20:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Color of Red-Green Alliance

Hi :)

In Denmark, where I live, orange is the color that is identified with Red-Green Alliance. This is so that the party's color doesn't get confused with the Social Democrats. The prove of this can be seen by our two biggest tv stations, DR and TV2. Proof of this is here. (https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/politik/folketingsvalg/resultater) (https://nyheder.tv2.dk/folketingsvalg/valgresultater)

Add to that, on the official authorized parliament site, the party is orange (https://www.ft.dk/da/folketingssalen/salsoversigten#/Oversigt?date=20230202).

I know that their logo is red, but Danish People's Party logo is red and blue, while Liberal Alliance is dark blue.

However because the media uses yellow for Danish People's Party and turquoise for Liberal Alliance, we have made the wikipedia colors of those two parties yellow and turquoise on wikipedia.

If we color Red-Green Alliance red, it will not be as easy to differ with Social Democrats, as it would be if it were orange. Therefore their primary color should be orange.

Hope you'll have a great evening. Regards :) Thomediter (talk) 22:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The colour template is for their infobox, pure electoral colours should not be used for the party infobox, only on election- and parliament-articles. Their infobox should not use a secondary colour but their official one, it is that simple! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 22:17, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you exactly mean by official color. Their official color is orange because that's what the media use, same as Danish People's Party and Liberal Alliance.

Regards, thomediter :) Thomediter (talk) 22:18, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Their official colour is not determined by the media. A colour that is assigned to them for electoral purposes of distinction is not by default their official colour. Furthermore, it is not only possible but rather common for one party to use several colours! Lastly, how this is solved in the articles of other parties does not automatically determine how it is done in this article, it is case-by-case! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 22:23, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At this page Danish People's Party, their official color is stated as red, however their infobox is yellow and has been for a long time. I am just arguing that it should be the same for this party. If we change their official color, it will not be shown properly on places like this 2021 Brønderslev municipal election. It should be orange, so it is easier to distinct from Social Democrats. Why does your idea not count for Danish People's Party and Liberal Alliance, but for Red-Green Alliance

Regards, thomediter :) Thomediter (talk) 22:28, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, we can have both, but infoboxes of parties should always use their primary colour, electoral pages may use a separate one. And again, the colour template is for party infobox use, electoral articles should not use such templates unless the party only has a single primary colour, especially as a party over the years may have used different colours in elections over time, which a single template will never be able to fully represent. Furthermore, the infobox itself and the seats-section of the infobox does not need to have the same colour, especially if their primary colour and their electoral colour differs. And again, how this is solved in the articles of other parties determines nothing on this front, as there is no agreed-upon standard for how to solve this for all parties in all countries! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 22:39, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Broad Front(Uruguay)

Why did you undo my revision? I'd like to make sure we're on the same page, rather than just add it back in without mentioning anything. General Lemarc (talk) 07:02, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The edit was unsourced and also ignores the fact that the Broad Front also includes parties on the center-left. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 14:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It did? I see now that I forgot a source, but I remember leaving in the part that said centner left. My goal was to update the information to show that the Broad Front includes parties from the center-left, to left wing, to far-left. Well, if I did screw that up, I apologize. I'll find a source. General Lemarc (talk) 20:01, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

URNG: Primary sources tag

Hello there,

the edit history told me that you inserted the primary sources tag to this article. As you might have noticed, I began a major revamp of the article and think the issue has been resolved by now, but obviously I also wanted to ask the inserter about his opinion. If you have any further suggestions for the article, please do not hesitate to let me know. ΙℭaℜuΣatthe☼ (talk). 15:51, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mistakes

There were several seals used during the Maratha Empire and there was no official Or unofficial seal made for the whole empire. 2405:204:971F:6D68:0:0:A84:A0AD (talk) 20:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understanding the reverts

Hello there

I'd really like to understand the motive for your reverts as I didn't see any justification for such actions from your part. Especially for the concept of secularism as it was one of the big factors in it getting elected with the future Bill 21 and the removal of the christ figure in the national assembly being consequences of such policy, which got a lot of talking around and became one of the key points the CAQ uses to argue for itself into a now very relevant social issue that seems to be to be important enough to earn a mention as it has been for almost two decades. As for why I changed it to the economic conservatism instead of just being conservative, that's because there aren't any really conservative social policies nor has the party ever claimed to be conservative or identified as such. If it was the whole package, it would seem to warrant it, but the only real conservatism I could find was in its fiscal policy, which made it an important nuance to me. It is quite important to show readers the nuances at play else it could give an inaccurate picture for them to make a judgment on, it wasn't trying to condone or minimize anything or oppose anything, simply trying to give readers a more accurate presentation with the nuances and labels with conditions to be warranted.

This was why I did it, why did you do it? 96.22.228.193 (talk) 19:39, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]