Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fair Dinkum Histories
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) at 05:02, 13 March 2023 (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (1x)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 05:02, 13 March 2023 by Legobot (talk | contribs) (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (1x))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. (non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 01:00, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair Dinkum Histories (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No claim of notability. Unclear how this might meet WP:NBOOKS. Search on the article title brings up primary sources and a few blogs. RadioFan (talk) 11:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No indication of notability ╟─TreasuryTag►condominium─╢ 12:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Aussiereviews.com (see their review policy here) reviewed five parts of the cycle: Shipwrecks, Sailors & 60,000 Years, Grim Crims & Convicts, Rotters and Squatters, Gold, Graves and Glory, A Nation of Swaggies and Diggers. The last part (Booms, Busts and Bushfires) was reviewed by VISE (Volunteers for Isolated Students Education). We already have quite detailed information on Horrible_Histories#Spin-offs and I can imagine a decent article on this cycle. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 12:57, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 13:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 13:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 14:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Baseball Watcher 21:44, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.