Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jung Keun-Hee
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) at 07:51, 13 March 2023 (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (1x)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 07:51, 13 March 2023 by Legobot (talk | contribs) (Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (1x))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) TheSpecialUser TSU 04:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Jung Keun-Hee[edit]
- Jung Keun-Hee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable player. This player only has 4 appearences. the article should be incubated until the player is established in the league. tausif(talk) 07:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - "Only" 4 appearances is sufficient to establish the presumption of notability per WP:NFOOTBALL. Camw (talk) 08:29, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:38, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - currently meets WP:NFOOTBALL; needs to be brought up to meet WP:GNG. Needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 13:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - article meets WP:NFOOTBALL though it needs improvement. Mentoz86 (talk) 13:52, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – those 4 caps appear to be relatively recent. If they were spread within (let's say) four seasons, I'd lean towards delete, especially since he appears to fail WP:GNG. In any case, as for the latter part it still needs improvement. – Kosm1fent 14:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.