User talk:Rombler

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Rombler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the reason and block of the my acount, not should have evaded block in acounts in several years and month, understand the reason for "sockpuppet", I Want to contribute the project, i want to reach a consensus, i ask one unblock for fix the problem, and i promise to improve.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I understand the reason and block of the my acount, not should have evaded block in acounts in several years and month, understand the reason for "sockpuppet", I Want to contribute the project, i want to reach a consensus, i ask one unblock for fix the problem, and i promise to improve.  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand the reason and block of the my acount, not should have evaded block in acounts in several years and month, understand the reason for "sockpuppet", I Want to contribute the project, i want to reach a consensus, i ask one unblock for fix the problem, and i promise to improve.  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand the reason and block of the my acount, not should have evaded block in acounts in several years and month, understand the reason for "sockpuppet", I Want to contribute the project, i want to reach a consensus, i ask one unblock for fix the problem, and i promise to improve.  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Not using a neutral point-of-view, adding your own commentary

Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the information is reliable and verified.. ¿what is the problem? Rombler (talk) 16:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Being casually described as "king of reggaeton" by one publication does not merit inclusion in the WP:LEDE as such. Furthermore, that article is almost 10 years old.OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, but the the rest information is correct.. Rombler (talk) 16:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, there was nothing useful in your edits. "The artist was recognized for Billboard as one Reggaeton Legend also was recognized for Rolling Stone as one Reggaeton Legend and Icon" is poorly written and not not useful, and the remaining portion of your edits seemed to be just unnecessarily duplicating references. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

well i can fix it, the information is reliable and correct.. Rombler (talk) 16:52, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The "King" stuff is already covered in the "Career" section and doesn't belong in the WP:LEDE. If you have other suggestions for the article, please take them to the talk page first and seek a consensus. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning for violating NPOV and introducing grammar mistakes

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

We require written competence in the English language; please consider contributing to the Wikipedia corresponding to your native language. Additionally, you dont seem to understand the other problems with your edits despite numerous warnings. If you resume making the same sort of edits when this block expires, you will be blocked again for a longer duration. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 20:07, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

undertand, the onblock the my acount,i ask for an opportunity.. Rombler (talk) 21:58, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You'd need to appeal from your original account, User_talk:MaikoltheGangale, though that would be a waste of time given the amount of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT and WP:CIR issues that are evident. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]