Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millhouse Blues band

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:05, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Millhouse Blues band

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced personal essay about a band which clearly fails to meet WP:BAND. Claims of minor coverage prevent speedy deletion but do not meet WP:GNG and are substantiated by zero Google references (except Wikipedia itself). Contains somewhat blatant advertising for a "reunion" pub gig which another editor removed, but it has returned. I42 (talk) 07:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence that they existed yet alone that they were notable. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I've tried a quick clean up to see if it looks any better, but to no avail. The page was created without any editing skill by copying and pasting a page layout from another article - hence the duplicate contents section, and the unused headers. Internet searches have produced no results. The band is not notable and the article may even be a hoax.--Kudpung (talk) 14:25, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 08:53, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 20:08, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I was the one who removed the blatant promotion when this came across NewPages, and although I poked around a little bit for signs of notability and didn't find them I thought I'd let other patrollers check it out. I'm glad to know it wasn't just that my searching ability was deficient. Glenfarclas (talk) 00:53, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.