Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ACOPT
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 13:59, 8 April 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- ACOPT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NN product. Article failed {{prod}} after COI author objected. Toddst1 (talk) 18:32, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 20:03, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I find a variety of false positives, but nothing significant about this software. "Active+Constraint+OPTimization" returns 4 hits, none of importance. Glenfarclas (talk) 21:55, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with above: "Active+Constraint+OPTimization" returns 4 hits, none of importance. And, returns 0 hits if you search "Active+Constraint+OPTimization" news sources --FaceMash (talk) 14:26, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.