User talk:Shezthz

This is Shezthz's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bindiya Sarkaar (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bindiya Sarkaar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 12:34, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shezthz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 12:34, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bindiya Sarkaar (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No review exists. Not having reviews brings a big question on the notability of the TV series.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bindiya Sarkaar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 10:16, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creating the article

Hey, Shethz I want your help to edit my new article Lovepantii which is now in draft space so please edit this article with References and alongside with infobox too. 2402:3A80:1E04:4A40:0:1:DDD1:D201 (talk) 15:03, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that this page has been deleted after an AFD discussion. The draft must be accepted by a reviewer, not just moved into article space. Ravensfire (talk) 15:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creating Chhotki Chhatanki

Hey, Shezthz I want a help you to edit my new article named Chhotki Chhatanki which is now on draft space so please edit the article with plot, cast, production, and references alongside with infobox too. Zedgehog 2.0 (talk) 07:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Leo Francis 92. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 08:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

me

Shezthz (talk) 12:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shezthz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I not abused in wikipedia and This is my only one account Shezthz (talk) 02:06, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sockpuppet or not, I don't think you are competent enough in English to properly edit here. Perhaps you should edit on your native-language Wikipedia. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Daniel Case: Sockpuppet or not??? If you dont know Sockpuppet or not the why blocked me. I dont edit all Wikipedia sentences i only edit Some English words.I English wikipedia all Administrator's Blocking People without any reason.🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️You people Dont check correctly i think your work is only blocking the people in wikipedia.It seems that the one who blocks more people in wikipedia they will get more salary or Money. You should improve your IP checking aur Sockpuppet Checking technology.Poor people get blocked on English Wikipedia without any mistake.1 Minutes Silence for them who blocked in Wikipedia without any Reason(including Me).