Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rawat Saraswat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Eddie891 (talk | contribs) at 14:11, 13 April 2023 (Rawat Saraswat: Closed as keep (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rawat Saraswat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence or assertion of notability. Paradoctor (talk) 12:37, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That said, I don't believe that he won the Sahitya Akademi Award! Per the author-bio in Modern Indian Literature, an Anthology: Surveys and poems (p. 997), Saraswat won a Rajasthan Sahitya Akademi award (note that this bio was published a few years after the subject's death, and is therefore unlikely to have pre-dated or missed mentioninng the national level award) and I haven't located any source that says otherwise. Pinging @Mccapra and SouthernNights: in case this affects their !vote or if they have other sources for the award. Abecedare (talk) 02:27, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
After digging more into the award I agree with your assessment. But I still believe all the other info still proves his notability, as you said.--SouthernNights (talk) 17:06, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarifying that. Given that it’s still a state award and given what else we know about the subject, my !vote is still to keep. Mccapra (talk) 14:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.