Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Holub

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2023 April 22.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:11, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Allen Holub

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is more about a cheap advertisement for Allen Holub rather than about actual achievements. E.g. in the article there is a list of former employers. There is nothing notable about him. CasperGoodwood (talk) 18:12, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:21, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have been unable to find any sources that contribute to notability of this subject. Yes, he has a few Google Scholar citations, but nothing like the number that could show a pass of WP:PROF#C1 in the highly-cited field of computer science. I've tried to ignore that fact that the article claimed that he was a distinguished professor when in fact the source said "assistant adjunct professor". Phil Bridger (talk) 19:30, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, does not meet WP:BIO Jinian (talk) 20:29, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:10, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Definitely does not pass WP:PROF (only one publication with triple-digit citations in a high-citation field) but WP:AUTHOR is possible if enough reviews of his many books can be found. I didn't find any reviews on Google Scholar or JSTOR but that's not entirely a surprise as they are not academic books. Maybe there are reviews in trade magazines? I'd be willing to change my opinion on this case if they turn up. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:46, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources found, agree that this does appear promotional. There are no reviews of his works, or much of anything discussing the person. Oaktree b (talk) 01:36, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:PROF and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:23, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.