Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theo Afework

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify‎ . ✗plicit 12:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Theo Afework

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searches did not turn up any in-depth references from independent, reliable, secondary sources. There are two pieces in the current article, from 13th Man Sports and Northern Tribune, but neither source looks to be reliable, containing simple postings with no editorial oversight. Fails WP:GNG Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:47, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Return to Draft I created it as a draft and another user has moved it to mainspace twice. RedPatch (talk) 10:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 12:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. RedPatch (talk) 13:32, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Return to draft per above. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify/userfy - not yet notable but I see no reason why RedPatch can't continue to work on this outside of mainspace until notability can be demonstrated, considering that they are not the user that keeps moving this article. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:51, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Return to draft per Das osmnezz. 2001:569:74E3:4000:E86E:3A26:2A4F:ED4E (talk) 02:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draft per author reuqest, article is sourced only to a databases, mentions in game articles, and routine sports news such as trades. Fails BLP, GNG, BIO. There are no IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BEFORE showed lots of promo, but nothing that meets SIGCOV. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV). // Timothy :: talk 05:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify - not currently notable. Giant Snowman 11:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Return to Draft as per creator's request - teenager who has never even warmed the bench for the worst team in the lowest-ranked fully professional team in the nation. And ping User:Mtaglion who kept moving it to mainspace. WhyUser:onel5969 did you not notify them, as you reverted their first attempt, and AFDed after the second attempt? Nfitz (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.