Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio Reșița

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:26, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Radio Reșița

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. --NGC 54 (talk｜contribs) 15:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Romania. Shellwood (talk) 15:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Czech government thinks they're useful (?) Elinruby (talk) 23:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Link Elinruby (talk) 23:30, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:21, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Seems to have ample coverage (and also considerable importance). Looks to have been at the center of some significant political controversies in 2019 and 2020. Even the subject of some English-language analysis from journalistic and technical perspectives (although I suspect that the latter "journal" is not an RS) and some very interesting political analysis. One show from the station appears to have given rise to an entire book. Here is a story from RRC about the station's 25th anniversary that contains some interesting background (independence may be an issue for that one, although I'm a bit unclear how closely the different public stations in Romania are related). In sum, although I am ill-placed to evaluate the sources, even with my very poor Romanian search skills there doesn't seem to be any shortage of sources. Unclear why nom considered what appears to be a prominent and fairly controversial station to be "not notable". -- Visviva (talk) 00:57, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the great work done above by Visviva. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 15:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.