Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 June 27

June 27

File:YBF title card 2010.jpg

Former logos are not covered by fair use Dronebogus (talk) 00:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:ComeAlongWithMeTitleCard.jpg

Same reason this has been deleted three other times: fails WP:NFCC, used for decoration and not any educational or critical purpose. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BeatBro:, why do you keep on doing this? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photograph of Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale.jpg

Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale already has an NFCC image File:Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale.jpg making this file invalid claim of fair-usage — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 06:47, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photograph of Guru Yuvraj Singh Sodhi, current Gaddi Nashin of the Mina subsect of Pothi-Mala, Guru Harsahai.jpg

Living person, invalid fair-usage claim WP:NFC#UULP — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:17, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photograph of Guru Haresh Singh Sodhi, former Gaddi Nashin of the Mina subsect of Pothi-Mala, Guru Harsahai.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Person might still be alive as stated in the rationale, thus invalid fair-usage claim WP:NFC#UULP — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DaxServer I have updated the file description as he died in 2012: https://pothimala.com/descendants-of-guru-ram-das-ji/ ThethPunjabi (talk) 08:21, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:National Development Council (NDC) of India logo.jpg

This is not the logo of the organization, but a banner for its 56th meeting's webcast — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:36, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gram Jyoti Yojana (DDUGJY) logo.png

From the official website, the entity does not have any logo, rather a simple text. That text needs to go to Commons com:COM:TOO India, if at all — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I retrieved this graphic from a Government of India social media post: link ThethPunjabi (talk) 18:06, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't see how that could be inferred as a logo — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 20:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The official website https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/ and the PDF https://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf do not carry the logo depicted. Third-party creations do not represent an officiated logo — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 09:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a third party creation. This was taken from the Oschner Journal website, but you can find the same logo on the Exploration of Neuroscience website and on the PAGEPress Publications website. That the current website doesn't carry that specific logo doesn't mean it's not their logo. You can't find the Nintendo Seal of Quality on the Nintendo Website either. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 09:53, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, okay. Thanks for the research. I was not sure if they ever created that logo or just another internet creation. I guess I'll withdraw unless there's anything more to add — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 12:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clinical Trials Registry – India (CTRI) logo.jpg

The text seems to be cut off manually from a banner https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/images/800.jpg indicating the text might not be the logo, while a logo is available at https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/cont1.php now at Commons File:Logo of Clinical Trials Registry, India.gif — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 09:52, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gudzenko Semen.jpg

There is nothing in the sources given to confirm that this image has indeed been first published in the Ukraine. If it was first published in Russia, then even anonymous post-1946 works would be copyrighted in the US since URAA restoration. Felix QW (talk) 12:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kiev Radyanskaya pl approx1930.jpg

As an image of around 1930 credited to a specific person, there is no reason to assume that it would be PD in Ukraine either now or at the URAA restoration date, January 1st, 1996. This would make it copyrighted in the US until 95 years after publication and in Ukraine for presumably much longer. Felix QW (talk) 12:48, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Starobelsk Faculty.jpg

Low resolution image, for which TinEye gives a 2008 hit from starobelsk.lnpu.edu.ua/, the university's own webpage. I am not speedy-ing it as a copyvio since it has been on Wikipedia since 2007. Felix QW (talk) 12:59, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Institute of Culture.jpg

Low resolution image, for which TinEye gives a 2008 hit from iki.lnpu.edu.ua/, the university's own webpage. I am not speedy-ing it as a copyvio since it has been on Wikipedia since 2007. Felix QW (talk) 12:59, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pavlo Skoropadsky 2.jpg

Redundant to File:Pavlo Skoropadsky.jpg. Although the tone is different and it is therefore not a duplicate, it is somewhat lower quality than the version on Commons and unused. Felix QW (talk) 13:18, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint Michaels Cathedral (Kiev) in ruins.jpg

This image, presumably from 1936-8, relies on anonymous authorship for public domain status in both Ukraine and the US, but has no source information whatsoever to verify whether authorship is truly anonymous. Felix QW (talk) 13:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. In accordance with Article 472 of the Civil Code of the Ukrainian SSR of 1963: "Copyright for photographic works and works obtained by means similar to photography shall be recognized if the name of the author, place and year of publication of the work are indicated on each copy of the work." And in accordance with Article 493, "Copyright for photographic works and for works obtained by methods similar to photography belongs to the author for five years, and for collections of such works - for ten years from the date of release of these works." This law was in force until 1993. Thus, any photography made in Ukraine before 1988 is in the public domain, both in Ukraine and in the USA. --Yakudza (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment! Unfortunately, the 1993 Copyright Act stipulated in its Section VI.4, final provisions, that

after the date of entry into force of this Law the terms of protection of copyright stipulated in Article 28 of this Law and parts 1 and 2 of Article 44 of this Law shall apply in all cases when the 50-year period of validity of copyright after the author's death or the period of validity of related rights has not expired prior to the date of entry into force of this Law.

So it was in fact explicitly retroactive, recopyrighting also those works whose shorter previous term had expired. Felix QW (talk) 18:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. per Yakudza. Ukrainian copyright law is quite clear on this image's status. Take an image search and you will find this image being used on multiple news sources. I can sure find you the source where the image came from, even the encyclopedia, but it is impractical and perhaps impossible to find an author. We are talking about 1930's Stalinist USSR, not a modern day society that keeps plenty of records. The historical relevancy of keeping this image on Wikipedia is immensely great - this is one of the oldest cathedrals in Ukraine that we are talking about, and it was destroyed. This is one of the only images documenting that. § DDima 06:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Onecms-homepage.jpg

Archived snapshot does not indicate a free license. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]