Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of North Korea, Mexico City
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Embassy of North Korea, Mexico City (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is just a list of non notable ambassadors and not about the actual embassy itself. Fails GNG and WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 05:09, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, perhaps cutting out some unverified information. It seems like embassies should be considered notable per se, but we don't have a specific agreed upon callout for them yet. The sources taken together may not meet SIGCOV. However, if the outcome is to delete, would be preferable to do a partial merge of verified information and redirect to Mexico–North Korea relations. There's some precedence for this. —siroχo 08:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Do you have any in-depth sources that establish notability? LibStar (talk) 09:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- No sources, sorry. I am !voting like that because it seems that embassies should probably be considered notable per se. It's not exactly something I'm ready to WP:VP or WP:RFC yet, so I'm more floating the idea. —siroχo 10:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- There is no inherent notability for embassies. LibStar (talk) 10:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Are you able to link me to any prior discussion about this? —siroχo 18:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- The fact that they have been previously deleted or redirected demonstrates no inherent notability. LibStar (talk) 22:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Are you able to link me to any prior discussion about this? —siroχo 18:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- There is no inherent notability for embassies. LibStar (talk) 10:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- No sources, sorry. I am !voting like that because it seems that embassies should probably be considered notable per se. It's not exactly something I'm ready to WP:VP or WP:RFC yet, so I'm more floating the idea. —siroχo 10:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Do you have any in-depth sources that establish notability? LibStar (talk) 09:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Korea, and Mexico. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:34, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Merge to Mexico–North Korea relations. Embassies are not inherently notable (as buildings, they need to meet WP:NBUILDING), but I do think that this content could be used to expand the parent article (that on the relations between the two states). — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:35, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider Delete, Keep and Merge/Redirect options.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:09, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Delete. Stub article which is basically a list of non-notable persons. Every person on the list is redlinked as well. ConcentratedCobalt (talk) 00:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:03, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Embassies are not inherently notable, and this is just a stub containing a red linked list of non-notable people. --TheInsatiableOne (talk) 10:39, 7 July 2023 (UTC)