User talk:Kafziel

I like to keep both sides of my discussions together, so if you leave me a message here, I will reply here. If I left a question on your talk page, please reply there; I'm watching your page so I will get back to you as soon as possible. Thanks!

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 2 days days are automatically archived to User talk:Kafziel/archive4. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Archives

About Technical analysis software

Thanks for the recent revert. This article is often modified for commercial promotion. If you feel for it, can you have a look at the on-going dispute of neutrality related to changes from Sensatus? Since you are an editor, your experience and feedback in the Technical Analysis Software discussion page will be particularly welcome. Regards. Mfortier 06:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you also block?

Thank you for blocking that other vandal. However, the vandalism continues with other IP's. Despite the warning this IP Special:Contributions/74.136.100.202 has continued. Can you please block? --CyclePat 20:25, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Problem solved. Thanks! --CyclePat 20:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FreeCol Deletion

An editor has asked for a deletion review of FreeCol. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Kc4

Hey, just so you know, if you didn't speedy based on sources, it was my misunderstanding. I just read the deletion log summary, so my bad. Keep on keepin' on! --badlydrawnjeff talk 21:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was just referring to WP:ATT and that I wasn't able to find any reliable sources through my own searching to confirm its notability (not realizing at the time that Sourceforge is considered a valid source). I didn't mean to imply that the reason for deletion was because it was unsourced, although looking at the summary I can see how one might get that impression. I'll try to think of a better way to say it next time. Kafziel ^Talk 21:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you clearly consented to overturn your deletion, I went ahead and did it for you. For your future information, you could just do the overturn and close the deletion review yourself. Or do the overturn and make a note if you prefer. GRBerry 21:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know. WP:DRV says they have to stay up for at least five days, and I didn't know if that meant they could be closed early by the deleting admin. (Like on AfD, we don't necessarily close early just because the nominator changes his mind.) Anyway, thanks for taking care of it, and I'll know in the future (if, heaven forbid, I ever make a mistake like that again). Kafziel ^Talk 21:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody help meeeeee!

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Yes, I tend to agree. Request handled by: Yamla 21:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yay! :) Kafziel ^Talk 21:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AAAAarrgghhh I am soo sorry. That's what comes of blocking when tired. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 21:09, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! The only bummer is that it means some dastardly vandal gets a freebie! Ha ha ha... Kafziel ^Talk 21:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Netherlands Squad 1988 European Championship

Hey, I saw you deleted this (and it was transcluded on a few pages such as Marco Van Basten). I was wondering whether you would consider undeleting it (that is, if it was a template like all the other templates of this type and not some vandalism). Regardless of who created it, it is useful, especially since they won the tournament that year. Thanks, Yonatan ^talk 21:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking about that while I was working on them, earlier today. Technically, the creations of a banned user are supposed to be deleted, but I think you're right: if it's good for Wikipedia, it's good for Wikipedia. Since it matters to other articles, I'll restore them. Kafziel ^Talk 21:35, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for IAR'ing this time. ;) Yonatan ^talk 22:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Objection on deletion of pooya mirzaee rad

Hi, The article is similar to other articles which my friends made . I tried to add references and some sources. everyday I studied the wiki and beforehand I tried on sandbox. Now when I was getting successful to put some photos with correct copyright way , you've just deleted my page.

There are several websites about Pooya Mirzaee Rad . and I was trying to make a integrated link referenced to each claim on the page.

Anyway I don't believe that this article should be deleted and I was wondering whether you would consider undeleting. Even I don't have the content to make it better and make it a standard one to wiki.

I'm so unhappy about it because I had not comment to correct the problems.

in the article pooya mirzaee rad there was no advertisement. a user introducing web page or something like that. it was all about kharizmi festival which is an important event and winners are most important topics to follow.

Here in pooya mirzaee rad I was trying to 1- introduce the person who had first winning innovation poroject in a country 2- make a list of awards achieved (to show importance of the topic) 3- list the projects and details . please consider these projects and what that guy done was unique in world , so why it whouldn't be on wiki?

Help me to improve it and help me to have the content back .

another one of my friends he is successful to have a page introducing and administrators are keeping him up : please search fardad farahzad

please advice...

Pooyarad 05:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]