Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Honório Júnior

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:39, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alex (footballer, born 2001)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about semi-pro footballer which comprehensively fails WP:GNG; the only online coverage consists of match reports and statistical database entries. PROD was contested without making any effort to address the article's WP:SPORTCRIT failure. Jogurney (talk) 13:33, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Brazil. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:14, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:14, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@BrazilianDude70:, I trust you most with Brazilian footballers, any chance you can confirm if there's any valid coverage for this athlete?--Ortizesp (talk) 20:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ortizesp: No notable coverage, only a brief direct mention here due to his loan to Taquaritinga. Other than that, nothing substancial, thus delete. BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 20:27, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I wasn't going to contest the original PROD, because Alex Honório does fail GNG. It's an article I created a while ago relying on WP:FOOTY, and I did expect to find sources when searching, but was unable to. Shame, but delete. Davidlofgren1996 (talk) 22:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 09:50, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.