User talk:Jogurney

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archives: 1, 2, 3


You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at WFCforLife's talk page. --WFC-- 17:40, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Hey there. Sorry to bother you again. Just remembered that I'd configured this catscan a little while back, and thought it might be of interest to you too. It takes about a minute to load, but lists the smallest football player biographies on wikipedia. Many of them are unreferenced, and given that I set the limit to 500 bytes, anything that is referenced is obviously of an even lower quality to still manage to fall under that limit. Regards, --WFC-- 05:11, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

US Second tier[edit]

The citations are 404, and I don't think they operate as full pro. P.S, archive your talk page or something! Govvy (talk) 16:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

red stats roster[edit]

i added collected soccerway stats at the talk page. maybe it does help you. -Koppapa (talk) 18:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, Jogurney. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Malacateco.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Malacateco.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewing[edit]

Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg
Hello, Jogurney.

As one of Wikipedia's most experienced editors,
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 22:15, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Articles for Creation Reviewing[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Hello, Jogurney.
AfC submissions
Random submission
~4 weeks
1646 pending submissions
Purge to update

I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged.
Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 01:38, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hoang Anh Gia Lai.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hoang Anh Gia Lai.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Mozaikka sock[edit]

Thanks for tackling some of the decade-old damage from the Mozaikka sock! Hmm, I hadn't spotted the "Hporion" alias before - that's the oldest one yet. It's unfortunate that the community is so hesitant to remove this clear hoaxing. There's several other articles that need removing as well! Hmm, looking deeper at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.D. Moma - gosh, there's an even older User:Encephalon2 that possibly part of this too - hopefully no relationship to User:Encephalon (doesn't look related). I wonder if it would be easier to G3 many of these. Nfitz (talk) 20:41, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Cang Sai Gon FC.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Cang Sai Gon FC.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cang Sai Gon FC.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cang Sai Gon FC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 1 July 2018 (UTC)