Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Shaw (actor) (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TheInsatiableOne (talk | contribs) at 09:50, 6 August 2023 (→‎Joe Shaw (actor)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Joe Shaw (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's not as abysmally sourced as the article previously deleted at AfD, but the underlying notability issue has not changed since the last AfD a few years ago. Nowhere near meeting WP:GNG, online coverage of the subject is trivial or else not independent. In principle could be redirected to Martin Shaw as {{r from child}}, but there's almost no information about Joe Shaw at that page. signed, Rosguill talk 00:13, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment table: prepared by User:IAmHuitzilopochtli
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
Joe Shaw Online No This is a primary source. ? Unclear. Probably reliable? Yes No
Digiguide.tv Yes Not affiliated Joe Shaw. ? No Just a routine database entry. No
Amazon Yes Not affiliated Joe Shaw. Yes No Just a routine database entry. No
Rotten Tomatoes Yes Not affiliated Joe Shaw. Yes No Just a routine database entry. No
OpenDMB Yes Not affiliated Joe Shaw. ? No Just a routine database entry. No
Gov.uk Yes Not affiliated Joe Shaw. Yes No Just a routine database entry. No
Rotten Tomatoes Yes Not affiliated Joe Shaw. ? No Just a routine database entry. No
MyLondon Yes Not affiliated Joe Shaw. Yes A generally credible news outlet No Just a passing mention. No
The Mirror (https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Dad%27s+fame+spoiled+my+childhood+but+being+an+actor+was+all+I+ever...-a062135390) Yes Not affiliated Joe Shaw. Yes A generally credible news outlet Yes An entire article. Yes
Brain Sharper Yes Not affiliated Joe Shaw. ? Clickbait website with unclear journalistic standards. No No. Just a brief mention alongside the rest of the cast. No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

IAmHuitzilopochtli (talk) 00:50, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That looks like it took a lot of effort. McFilet O' Fish Fan (talk) 01:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep.
    • Seems to meet WP:NACTOR with Rhodes, Bad Girls and Murder Investigation Team.
    • Seems to also meet WP:BASIC. Looking through proquest there are several different articles, including NYT[1], Chicago Tribune[2], etc [3] that have a few sentences of SIGCOV around his work in Rhodes along with his background. Additionally there is another Daily Mirror article from a different author, several years apart year that is an in-depth interview, but interspersed with independent assertions of facts about the subject [4]. Beyond that there's lots of varying coverage of subject's acting in various performances to sufficiently meet WP:BASIC.
siroχo 03:03, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]