Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filippa Knutsson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus is that the sources present within the article are sufficient to establish notability. Mz7 (talk) 04:18, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Filippa Knutsson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable person per sources. Fails WP:BLP. HindWiki^Connect 00:06, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. HindWiki^Connect 00:06, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. HindWiki^Connect 00:07, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. "Per sources"?! The sources at the time of submission to AFD indicated that Knutsson was a major businessperson and winner of a significant award (dating to 1772!) in her native country. She is the owner of a large company that has an existing Wikipedia article. I've added sources that indicate that her fame is widespread and more than establishes notability. Gamaliel (talk) 01:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article is shabbily written. Although a famous designer, content on her article is stubby but notable. Hence, I suggest merging Filippa Knutsson with Filippa K (her brand). Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 04:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:33, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If she's notable, we shouldn't merge and the article can be expanded. I agree with Gamaliel, clearly notable. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:13, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with Megalibrarygirl. The article needs expansion not deletion. Lacypaperclip (talk) 10:32, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sufficient sources for keep. Would be nice if someone can find date of birth, where from, etc. gidonb (talk) 03:48, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.