User talk:P3DRO

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

P3DRO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been blocked for four months and this time has served to think about my mistakes and not make them again. I have been a user of this space since 2007 and I would like to continue to contribute in a constructive and positive way. P3DRO (talk) 11:58, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

P3DRO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I have been blocked for personal attacks and use of slurs against another user, and that violates the Wikipedia policy. I'm not a Nazi, I have nothing against anyone, regardless of their race, belief or sexual orientation. It was a mistake and will not happen again. I have been a user of this space since 2007 and I would like to continue to contribute in a constructive and positive way. P3DRO (talk) 14:02, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please explain, if it's true that you "have nothing against anyone", why you used the slur that you did. Frankly I'm not entirely sure that you should be permitted to return in the near future, but any unblock request is going to need that to have any chance of success. 331dot (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

P3DRO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been harassed by a user for several years, who has insulted me in the past, reverted my work without explanation and is constantly spamming my talk page. In the heat of the moment, for the first time since I'm a user of WP, I used a slur to attack this user's sexuality. It was a poor choice of words in a heated moment. I fully understand my mistake and the damage that this term can cause to homosexuals. It was a thoughtless act, without thinking. It was a stupid outburst. I couldn't care less about the sexuality of the user in question. I'm not a Nazi. It was a one time mistake and I will not do it again. I have been a user of this space since 2007 and I would like to continue to contribute in a constructive and positive way. P3DRO (talk) 11:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The block evasion noted by Yamla below makes this request moot. Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Confirmed block evasion via logged-out editing, earlier this month. --Yamla (talk) 12:05, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

UTRS appeal #75107

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Link to ANI discussion for context. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PS-- I read English -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #78101

is closed. The earliest user is eligible for unblock consideration, due to block evasion, is December 14, 2023. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:21, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]