Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonards Andžāns

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was please re-list. Consensus is that the articles should be relisted and dealt with individually. (non-admin closure) AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 19:44, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Leonards Andžāns

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL Edgars2007 ^{(talk/contribs)} 07:59, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because they all seem to fail in the same way:

--Edgars2007 ^{(talk/contribs)} 08:09, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. Edgars2007 ^{(talk/contribs)} 08:13, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Edgars2007 ^{(talk/contribs)} 08:13, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Edgars2007 ^{(talk/contribs)} 08:13, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Edgars2007 ^{(talk/contribs)} 08:13, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Close nomination and relist individually, I looked at a few and they seemed decent enough. Nominator has to start anew and give a better rationale for why each article should be deleted. Geschichte (talk) 11:54, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Close and re-list per Geschichte - these are all of borderline notability and therefore this AfD could get very messy & confusing very quickly. Much better not to bundle in this kind of scenario. Giant Snowman 15:39, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.