Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Santana MontanaReal/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Courcelles (talk | contribs) at 16:19, 18 September 2023 (Archiving case section from w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Santana MontanaReal (using spihelper.js)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Santana MontanaReal

Santana MontanaReal (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

14 March 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

See contribs; including deleted and global ones. Considering the number of accounts, it would also probably be a good idea to check for sleepers. Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
Also found and  Confirmed:
SpiritualGod (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
SantanaMontanafl (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
SantanaMontanaLP (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Santana MontanaReal (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
SanranaMontanaEp (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
SantanaMontanaAcc (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Santana MontanaOne (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
 Stale:
SantanaMontanaPage (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Black Decorum (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
RealSantana Montana (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:51, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The oldest confirmed account is Santana MontanaReal, so I've moved the case there from "RealSantana Montana" (rather creative username choices here) and retagged everyone accordingly. I don't doubt the two stale but blocked ones are related, but I've left them untagged for the time being because I'm not sure how much it matters in this case. The remaining unblocked account hasn't edited since 2019. I'd be inclined to close this, but I still have my SPI training wheels on, so leaving for someone else. Blablubbs|talk 00:14, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Everyone is blocked or locked, I've requested locks on the unlocked accounts. Don't see much value in tagging the stale accounts. Closing. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:58, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

25 October 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

See deleted page and edits; have blocked and creating report for SPI tracking. SpencerT•C 15:16, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

25 October 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Obvious socks with single-minded effort at drafting a self-bio and moving it to mainspace. See, for example:

  1. Draft:Santana Montana created by (Muse) account.
  2. (Musical)'s talk page about the speedy deletion of a self-title article: Santana Montana (Musical).
  3. Here User:Santana Montana (Musix) moved his user page bio to mainspace.
  4. and again for User:Santana Montana (musick)
  5. Latest version of his article (Santana Montana (Musix)) was speedily deleted A7.

Each account is similar. Drafting a self-bio in user or draft space and moving it to main space where it is eventually deleted. They can all be blocked as obvious blocks, but suggest looking for sleepers. Archer1234 (talk) 02:15, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't noticed that Santana Montana (Artistic) is already blocked. – Archer1234 (talk) 02:18, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

26 October 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Account created July 8, 2020, attempted to use their talk page to experiment with drafing a page for Santana Montana. He also created a self-named mainspace article Justice Randdolf, which was speedily deleted (A7) on July 15, 2020. User:Justice Randdolf has not been used since July 9, 2020, but appears to be the oldest account associated with (and older than) Santana MontanaReal. Just wanted to submit this report to get it on the record. Blocking and tagging might be appropriate. – Archer1234 (talk) 17:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC) Archer1234 (talk) 17:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

16 September 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Just for the record: indeffed per WP:DUCK, only edits were self-promotion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, given the rich history here, requesting a CU sweep if anyone has the time. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:18, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]