Talk:Winnie the Pooh (franchise)

Disney Start‑class High‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media franchises Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I think that there's one more movie

Is there one more movie called " Pooh's Grand Adventure: The Search for Christopher Robin published in 1997 ‧ 1h 25m?" 2A02:587:1968:7200:F0D9:787:5C52:95E0 (talk) 22:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 August 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus EdJohnston (talk) 15:58, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Winnie the Pooh (franchise) → Winnie the Pooh (Disney franchise) – I think that the current name is too ambiguous, as there are multiple franchises based on Winnie the Pooh. There is the original book series and its related media, there is the Soyuzmultfilm franchise, and there is an upcoming cinematic universe based on Blood & Honey. By specifying that this page is about the Disney franchise, it can help to avoid potential confusion. While the Disney franchise is certainly the largest and most well-known, it is not the only Winnie the Pooh franchise. Di (they-them) (talk) 02:06, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:OVERPRECISION. There's no article about any other franchise, so no need to excessively disambiguate the title. Station1 (talk) 02:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think that citing WP:OVERPRECISION is wrong here. That page states that "titles should unambiguously define the topical scope of the article, but should be no more precise than that." The title "Winnie the Pooh (franchise)" does not "unambiguously define" the scope of the article because there are multiple franchises by that name. There is ambiguity, so by definition it is not unambiguous. Di (they-them) (talk) 05:53, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In the context of WP article titles, which is the policy we're talking about, the title is not ambiguous because it is the only article on WP (at least so far) about any Winnie-the-Pooh franchises. Info about all franchises could, optionally, be added to this article without changing its title. If you were to write another article about another Winnie-the-Pooh franchise, there might be a need for disambiguating titles at that point, but normally we don't disambiguate titles preemptively. Station1 (talk) 03:12, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support the base topic article Winnie-the-Pooh also serves as a franchise article, covering the overarching franchise, where the Disney one is an element of. -- 65.92.244.99 (talk) 03:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - per WP:OVERPRECISION. No other franchise exists (at least, no other has an article). In any case, the hatnote is sufficient. estar8806 (talk) ★ 20:25, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oppose per over-precision. no reason for being confused with some other winnie the pooh franchise. Hatnote is sufficient here. —usernamekiran (talk) 14:32, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.