User talk:Fancy vibēs

Question about your request for page protection

Hi Fancy vibēs, there is currently a question about your page protection request at WP:RFPP. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:17, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 12:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a sock of Anuj Ror

@Girth Summit I am not a sock of Anuj Ror I don't know why you think I am a sock.? Is there any edits or pages that were edit by me or by the blocked user Anuj Ror those may proove the claim.? Is there any evidence to block me or portrait me being a sock.? People explain. Fancy vißes (call) 15:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@user:jpgordon I have mentioned that the admin wrongly linked my account with strange users being my self-sock, so as you declined my request, is there any other way to ask other admins to again make a Checkuser request because I am honestly not a sock of these linked accounts? So if you can help me by suggesting another way to request Checkuser again against my account with more transparency, if I am saying honestly that I am not a sock of these linked accounts for God sake, believe me, I know this is not up to you, but you can suggest me a way to re-appeal a Checkuser request against my account and wrongly linked my account with previous blocked accounts.

have mention admin wrongly linked my account with strange users being my self sock so as you declined my request is there any other way to asked other admins for again make of a Checkuser request because I am honestly not sock of these linked accounts so if you can help me by suggesting me an another way to request again Checkuser against my account with more transparency if I am saying honestly I am not sock of these linked accounts for God sake believe me I know this is not up to you but you can suggest me a way to Re-appeal of Checkuser request against my account and wrongly linked of my account with previous blocked accounts. Fancy vißes (call) 17:14, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@jpgordon as you also have the right of administration and WP: Checkuser. Right, please, I request that you please check my account and these two wrongly linked accounts with my account. Please check last time because, honestly speaking, I am not sock of these linked accounts. You can check it is easy for you to check using your right of WP:Checkuser. For God sake, I have no other way to request the final review of my blocked or wrongly linked accounts. Please check for once being just and honest I beg you for the last time using your right of WP:Checkuser. Fancy vißes (call) 17:23, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi

@Jpgordon please check it using your WP: Checkuser right unfortunately I have not any other way to request for the review of my wrongly linked account with other previous blocked stranger accounts only you guys can make it clear being honest and just please. Fancy vißes (call) 17:35, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree Fancy vißes (call) 17:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fancy vibēs, I'm not a checkuser. I'd provide advice about how to appeal, but it's already present in the yellow box above and you have already appealed the block below, so there's nothing left for me personally to do here. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:55, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree okay admin I am really sorry for pinged you here I know this is not a good thing to ping Admins individually but I just pinged to open a final WP:Checkuser test for my account and wrongly linked accounts that's why I pinged two other admins also they maybe heard my voice and will open last WP:Checkuser test after that they can also revoke my page forever but honestly speaking and only God know I am telling a lie or truth as my unblocked appeal was rejected so I didn't found any other way to asked a last test of WP: Checkuser against my own account so I will again and again appeal for the unblock I know any admin will not unblock me ever but an admin who have Checkuser right may open test against my account and wrongly linked accounts for the last time because my last and final mistake was only to request again for the protection level increase of Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty and use of sources that strongly said they belonged to Pratihara Gurjar clan except this I didn't make any violation of Wikipedia. Fancy vißes (call) 18:05, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla I want to appeal a Checkuser investigation and test against my own account because my account was blocked and wrongly linked with two other previous blocked users who are entirely strangers to me. Even though these accounts are not engaged in editing or creating the same pages that I have edited or created since my existence on Wikipedia, I have only pinged you as you have the right to Checkuser. Please, for God's sake, being honest and just open a test against my and these two accounts, and if you're unable to do so, please request on my behalf, as I have no other way to appeal for a Checkuser test except my talk page. Fancy vißes (call) 18:24, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't have processed your unblock request without running the checkuser tool, and I stand by my findings and support Girth Summit's findings. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:38, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon But sir how does it work.? Even the account creation date, the IP ranges, the edited pages, edit summaries, editing behavior or the pages created by these accounts or by my account are entirely unfamiliar to each other.? And there is not any chance to show where this two accounts overlap with my account at what place.? If it is possible can you give any link to see etc or any link where my account and these accounts were involved in editings.? Fancy vißes (call) 18:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Review for the block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fancy vibēs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know why admin Girth Summit blocked me without previous edit warnings, any four-level edit warnings, or even without any previous block. I was involved in engaging in a discussion on the Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty's talk page, where I requested the keeping of some text and sources regarding the origin of the Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty, which belonged to the Pratihar clan of Gurjars. I also made a request for the increase in protection level of the Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty at admins request for increase in page protection (PPC). After a few hours, Girth Summit blocked me and linked me with two previous blocked user:Anuj Ror and Anuj Choudhary, but there were no significant edits or pages where this previous blocked user was involved, and I was also caught being involved in making edits on the pages where these previous blocked users, Anuj Ror and Anuj Choudhary Ror, were involved. There were not even any SPI investigation requests or reports against me being sock or any authentic reason or evidence to link myself with Anuj Ror and Anuj Choudhary Ror. I humbly request the unblocking of my account and the review of any other administrator's account because, when there is no evidence of significant similarities between my account, Anuj Ror, and Anuj Choudhary Ror's accounts, how can I be linked with these accounts without any evidence? If another WP:Checkuser can review and again see the previous checkuser's action against myself, it will be more transparent. There were not even any SPI investigation requests or reports against me being sock or any authentic reason or evidence to link myself with Anuj Ror and Anuj Choudhary Ror. I humbly request the unblocking of my account and the review of any other administrator's account because, when there is no evidence of significant similarities between my account, Anuj Ror, and Anuj Choudhary Ror's accounts, how can I be linked with these accounts without any evidence? If another checkuser can review and again see the previous checkuser's action against myself, it will be more transparen. This is not unfair to block me without any serious involvement of disruption editing, involvement of editing of same pages or content that may reflec me being sock of Anuj Ror or Anuj Choudhary Ror so when there are not significant proofs or evidence in Checkuser tool then it is not just to keep me block indefinite.Fancy vißes (call) 16:24, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:51, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fancy vißes (call) 16:24, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These are all public logs for my account and two wrongly linked accounts and wrongly declared me sock

@Jpgordon, Yamla, Cabayi, Stwalkerster

for all public logs of AnujRor (Total edits 510) (Created one year ago) see link AnujRor.

For all public logs of Anuj Choudhary Ror (total 79 edits) (created 5 months ago) see. Ror Choudhary these two accounts belonged to one entity and overlap with each other because of their editing behavior, Edit sumaries, only creating Ror caste related articles etc.

All public logs of my account are as follow (Total edits 3900) (created 2 year 9 months ago) see link. Fancy vibēs Therefore, based on the data from all public logs, none of these two accounts match or have anything to do with my account. Despite this, I am still barred without cause or error, which isn't unfair. Given that my editing style and the pages I choose to edit differ greatly from those of these incorrectly linked accounts, and since the data from all public logs clearly showed every page I have created, edited, or edited summaries, where are the administrators not taking notice of my plea for the WP:Checkuser test and appeal? My situation most clearly does not fit the description of improperly and needlessly tying my account to these other accounts. Fancy vißes (call) 19:47, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]