Jump to content

Talk:Isotopes of platinum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 80.215.247.152 (talk) at 16:34, 20 November 2023. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconElements: Isotopes List‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Isotope Taskforce.

Column

There is a column on the right entitled "Range of natural variation" with no items in it. This is idiotic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.7.176 (talk) 13:06, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the article Isotopes of copper, some numbers do appear in the column on the right, for the two stable isotopes of copper. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.27.109.117 (talk) 11:32, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of platinum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:18, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bound-state β− decay of 195Pt: reference required?

Could anyone please give some reference of the bound-state β− decay of 195Pt to 195Au, of which, unlike the cases of 163Dy and 205Tl, I can't find any? 129.104.241.214 (talk) 23:59, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Double beta decay of 190Pt?

The Wikipedia page Double beta decay states that 190Pt is also theorized to undergo β+β+ decay. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 02:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Possible alpha decay of 187,189,191,192,193,198Pt

According to [1], several isotopes of platinum should have a partial alpha decay half-life at the order of:

187Pt: 102 years;

189Pt: 107 years;

191Pt: 1013 years;

192Pt: 1022 years (according to [2]);

193Pt: 1025 years (and possibly as much long as 1032 years given the trend shown in the link above).

198Pt, having such a high N/Z ratio (second only to the alpha stable nuclide 204Hg among the stable nuclides), has a very low alpha decay energy of 0.11 MeV (higher only than that of 155Gd, 162Dy and 170Er among the stable nuclides), so alpha decay may be possible but with a half-life long beyond imagination (at the order of 10322 years as shown in the link above, second only to 10408 years for 170Er among the stable nuclides).